Skip to content

The “smart power” military-industrial complex takes off

What do Lockheed Martin Corp, Northrop Grumman Corp, and L-3 Communications Inc. have in common?

Yes, all are top 10 Pentagon contractors. But they are also increasingly winning lucrative government contracts to implement “smart power” or “nation-building” programs—like educating peacekeeping troops in human-rights law, sending anthropologists to Afghanistan to understand local culture, mentoring Liberian prosecutors to combat corruption and crime, and rebuilding airports and government ministries.

Hillary Clinton and others in the administration have helped pave the way for this shift by calling for a “smart power” approach in which the 3Ds—defense, diplomacy and development—are mutually reinforcing (which we respectfully acknowledged by giving the 3Ds idea our Grand Prize for Worst in Aid).

From yesterday’s Wall Street Journal (subscription required):

Defense firms are eager to oblige. “The definition of global security is changing,” says Lockheed’s Chairman and Chief Executive Robert Stevens. He wants the maker of the Air Force’s most advanced fighters to become a central player in the U.S. campaign to use economic and political means to align countries with American strategic interests

Last year, Lockheed had two of its highest profile programs, the F-22 Raptor fighter and a fleet of presidential helicopters, ended by the Obama administration. Now, Lockheed is one of several defense firms expected to bid for a new State Department contract to support “criminal justice sector development programs world-wide,” that could be worth up to $30 billion over five years.

Africa won’t be overlooked:

Africa—where few U.S. troops are stationed—is a major focus. Many countries on this continent already are, or risk becoming, failed states. While they previously hadn’t been considered a threat to the U.S., that view is changing. Somalia’s nexus of terrorism and piracy is one example of how destabilized countries can become a redoubt for al Qaeda or other terrorist groups.

The U.S. military is already overstretched between Iraq and Afghanistan. So the Pentagon is eager to send defense firms to fill the gaps, in the hope that investing millions in training or advisory programs today may stave off a regional calamity that could cost billions in the future.

“Africa certainly is an area of interest to our U.S. government customers, and what’s important to our customers is important to us,” said Lockheed’s Mr. Stevens.

Click on the picture to go to the WSJ and explore the interactive graphic (no sub required)

UPDATE: Vijaya Ramachandran reminded us on Twitter that she had a related post “Blurring the Line Between Defense and Development” on the CGD Blog:

In a little-noticed move in January, private military contractor DynCorp bought 100% of the shares of international development contractor Casals & Associates ….The .. merger suggests a blurring of the line between development and defense in the private sector, as well.

…what happens when unarmed development project managers and heavily armed private security providers work under the same company brand? How will local people respond to a company employed by both USAID and the U.S. military?

On the other hand, there are some clear advantages to the new approach….

This entry was posted in Aid policies and approaches, In the news, Military aid and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Jeff Holmes wrote:

    If you google the name of the article (Defense Industry Pursues Gold in ‘Smart Power’ Deals) and click on the WSJ link in the results you can bypass the paywall.

    Posted March 24, 2010 at 4:56 am | Permalink
  2. Dr. Kurtz wrote:

    As first-movers, HRIs private sector “consultant community” is licking their lips and already started recruiting “excellent experts” for these sorts of jobs:

    the 3D think is quite catchy though you gotta admit. what with the fuss over avatar and all. makes “2.0” sound so last week.

    which reminds me, what did the man say? “military development is to development what military music is to music”.

    Posted March 24, 2010 at 10:39 am | Permalink
  3. Vince Crawley wrote:

    REF the quote “Pentagon is eager to send defense firms to fill the gaps” [in Africa].

    That’s not quite on the mark. Nearly all the security-related contracts in Africa are Department of State contracts. General William Ward, commander of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM), is on the record telling Congress that his goal is to reduce the number of contractors and replace them with uniformed personnel. The great majority of State Department contractors are involved in peacekeeper training.

    Vince Crawley
    U.S. Africa Command Public Affairs

    Posted March 24, 2010 at 4:30 pm | Permalink
  4. The Nose Knows wrote:

    Vince may be technically correct, but the money behind much of USAID and State’s security work comes from Pentagon sources. I’ve seen a number of military projects whitewashed by having funding run through USAID missions. This will only increase in the future.

    As I was told once by a Pentagon staffer “USAID? They’re less than the sweat off one of our ICBM’s”

    Posted March 25, 2010 at 8:02 am | Permalink
  5. Daniel wrote:

    more of these

    Posted March 26, 2010 at 5:49 pm | Permalink

4 Trackbacks

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by @mikegechter's RSS, Chris Conrad. Chris Conrad said: Conflating the biggest "D" with the smallest "d" – WSJ and @aidwatch on defense contractors in Africa […]

  2. By Notes « Cousin Dampier's Blog on March 24, 2010 at 7:24 pm

    […] military contractors are evolving into PMI plus – they’re winning government contracts to do some state-building. In the Kaplan interview from That’s Capital, he discusses one […]

  3. By Friday Links | Vicki Boykis on March 25, 2010 at 9:57 pm

    […] Why Africa is the next Afghanistan, from Bill Easterly […]

  4. […] power and the military-industrial complex, aka why arms manufacturers are hiring anthropologists and legal rights advisers, c/o Aid Watch. […]

  • About Aid Watch

    The Aid Watch blog is a project of New York University's Development Research Institute (DRI). This blog is principally written by William Easterly, author of "The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists' Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics" and "The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good," and Professor of Economics at NYU. It is co-written by Laura Freschi and by occasional guest bloggers. Our work is based on the idea that more aid will reach the poor the more people are watching aid.

    "Conscience is the inner voice that warns us somebody may be looking." - H.L. Mencken

  • Archives