Skip to content

Teasing my friends at Center for Global Development: censoring for Hillary?

More updates on coverage of the big Clinton Development Speech, following up on the previous post:

Chris Blattman has a negative take. some negatives, some positives, so a mixed review. The Center for Global Development (CGD) blog is positive, although mostly only about the idea of the Secretary of State even giving a whole speech devoted to development. Duncan Green at Oxfam liked some of the specific ideas in the speech. The Chronicle of Philanthropy gave an overview, citing “mixed reviews.”

Mead Over disagreed with my “selectivity” complaint, saying Clinton was right to be LESS selective in health (don’t just do AIDS treatment, strengthen health systems!) I confess that Mead is right on that one.

The speech host, CGD, aggregated now all the news coverage they could find, except, wait, they don’t include any negative coverage…  They cited Foreign Policy — but they just gave the FP posting of the speech itself, not the review column (mine) at FP.

Oh, my dearest CGD friends, this couldn’t be some unconscious censorship of a negative view, could it?

The speech at least seems a focal point for a good discussion! Please continue to post your comments.

UPDATE: CGD has now put out a new press coverage aggregrate that includes negative coverage. I knew I could count on them, they’re good people. (They certainly are a LOT more responsive than the USAID that Hillary wants to reform, who would either not answer or refuse to change or both.)

This entry was posted in Aid policies and approaches and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

One Comment

  1. Ben Edwards wrote:

    Your article in the FP only recently came to our attention. I’ve updated our list of coverage to include your article along with others that were published after our initial sweep of press coverage on Wednesday. Read the most up-to-date list here:

    Ben Edwards
    Media Relations Coordinator
    Center for Global Development

    Posted January 8, 2010 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

One Trackback

  1. By uberVU - social comments on January 8, 2010 at 7:31 pm

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by bill_easterly: Hil Censor?Teasing pals at @CGDev, who give “summary” of reviews of Hillary development speech with only POSITIVE ones.

  • About Aid Watch

    The Aid Watch blog is a project of New York University's Development Research Institute (DRI). This blog is principally written by William Easterly, author of "The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists' Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics" and "The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good," and Professor of Economics at NYU. It is co-written by Laura Freschi and by occasional guest bloggers. Our work is based on the idea that more aid will reach the poor the more people are watching aid.

    "Conscience is the inner voice that warns us somebody may be looking." - H.L. Mencken

  • Archives