<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Misunderstanding Randomness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aidwatchers.com/2009/11/misunderstanding-randomness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/11/misunderstanding-randomness/</link>
	<description>just asking that aid benefit the poor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:48:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Protezionismo e sviluppo &#171; Economia Politica</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/11/misunderstanding-randomness/comment-page-1/#comment-7221</link>
		<dc:creator>Protezionismo e sviluppo &#171; Economia Politica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/?p=1432#comment-7221</guid>
		<description>[...] e restrizioni commerciali) possa giocare un ruolo positivo nel processo di crescita. In un breve intervento, William Easterly replica a questa affermazione e ribadisce l&#8217;importanza fondamentale [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e restrizioni commerciali) possa giocare un ruolo positivo nel processo di crescita. In un breve intervento, William Easterly replica a questa affermazione e ribadisce l&#8217;importanza fondamentale [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/11/misunderstanding-randomness/comment-page-1/#comment-7153</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/?p=1432#comment-7153</guid>
		<description>Maybe I am dumb, but to say that some countries &quot;have been more democratic than the rest of the world on average in the (very) long run&quot; sounds as nonsense to me.  I thought the point of prof. Easterly&#039;s original review was that we really do not know enough to make this kind of assertions without lots of particular qualifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I am dumb, but to say that some countries &#8220;have been more democratic than the rest of the world on average in the (very) long run&#8221; sounds as nonsense to me.  I thought the point of prof. Easterly&#8217;s original review was that we really do not know enough to make this kind of assertions without lots of particular qualifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tord Steiro</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/11/misunderstanding-randomness/comment-page-1/#comment-7145</link>
		<dc:creator>Tord Steiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/?p=1432#comment-7145</guid>
		<description>Umm, in this context, what is the relevant description of &#039;democracy&#039;?

Whether women can vote? Elections? Freedom of the press? And how to measure democracy in a scientific context?

To me, democracy is when the rulers are held responsible for their actions, when the transaction costs of changing the actions of the rulers (policy) are relatively low, and where the common man can engage in meaningful political discourse.

All of this can, in fact, be achieved without voting rights for anyone. In fact, under certain circumstances, voting can be bad for democracy. During the May elections in Malawi, I experienced a whole village sitting still outside the voting registrar for the entire day, protesting that &#039;their&#039; candidate (Tembo) had not given them T-shirts, as he had done to the neighbouring village. They refused to vote until they got T-shirts, and hence they sat outside in the sun the entire election day, waiting in vain. 

Malawi had free and fair elections, but the democracy in Malawi suffers from serious flaws, and elections seems to make some of these flaws worse. Especially as long as voters look upon their votes as assets they can sell for a T-shirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, in this context, what is the relevant description of &#8216;democracy&#8217;?</p>
<p>Whether women can vote? Elections? Freedom of the press? And how to measure democracy in a scientific context?</p>
<p>To me, democracy is when the rulers are held responsible for their actions, when the transaction costs of changing the actions of the rulers (policy) are relatively low, and where the common man can engage in meaningful political discourse.</p>
<p>All of this can, in fact, be achieved without voting rights for anyone. In fact, under certain circumstances, voting can be bad for democracy. During the May elections in Malawi, I experienced a whole village sitting still outside the voting registrar for the entire day, protesting that &#8216;their&#8217; candidate (Tembo) had not given them T-shirts, as he had done to the neighbouring village. They refused to vote until they got T-shirts, and hence they sat outside in the sun the entire election day, waiting in vain. </p>
<p>Malawi had free and fair elections, but the democracy in Malawi suffers from serious flaws, and elections seems to make some of these flaws worse. Especially as long as voters look upon their votes as assets they can sell for a T-shirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
