<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Round Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aidwatchers.com/2009/11/friday-round-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/11/friday-round-up/</link>
	<description>just asking that aid benefit the poor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:42:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Two interesting posts from Aid Watch &#171; No Cynics Allowed</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/11/friday-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-7210</link>
		<dc:creator>Two interesting posts from Aid Watch &#171; No Cynics Allowed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/?p=1464#comment-7210</guid>
		<description>[...] Two interesting posts from Aid&#160;Watch By Bill  The first is a bit off topic for that blog, but I enjoyed the short discussion of market forces within groups of monkeys. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two interesting posts from Aid&nbsp;Watch By Bill  The first is a bit off topic for that blog, but I enjoyed the short discussion of market forces within groups of monkeys. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Didier</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/11/friday-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-7207</link>
		<dc:creator>Didier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/?p=1464#comment-7207</guid>
		<description>At what point does one monkey do away with the other in order to obtain monopoly rights or do the original monkey&#039;s now form a trade association to bribe the scientists to keep them from training any more monkeys?...or is that just the way humans would behave?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At what point does one monkey do away with the other in order to obtain monopoly rights or do the original monkey&#8217;s now form a trade association to bribe the scientists to keep them from training any more monkeys?&#8230;or is that just the way humans would behave?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/11/friday-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-7202</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/?p=1464#comment-7202</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by mikegechter_rss: Friday Round Up: Monkeys Do Markets In a recent experiment, a team of scientists trained a vervet monkey to ope.. http://bit.ly/3npLAc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by mikegechter_rss: Friday Round Up: Monkeys Do Markets In a recent experiment, a team of scientists trained a vervet monkey to ope.. <a href="http://bit.ly/3npLAc.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3npLAc..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Freschi</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/11/friday-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-7198</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Freschi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/?p=1464#comment-7198</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt, Yes, of course it&#039;s not to slight people who continue to do good work in Iraq, but I also think that getting the best qualified people to go to conflict areas gets harder as a conflict drags on, or as security conditions worsen. People I have worked with on staffing in Iraq lamented that many of the most qualified people had already &quot;put in their time&quot; and were burnt out after the first two years or so, and there simply isn&#039;t an unlimited supply of good managers who also have the requisite regional experience, technical expertise and language skills.  The deteriorating security situation meant that it was harder and harder to do hands-on development work where aid workers could travel around the country and interact with beneficiary communities, and this added another major disincentive for the best people to take jobs there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt, Yes, of course it&#8217;s not to slight people who continue to do good work in Iraq, but I also think that getting the best qualified people to go to conflict areas gets harder as a conflict drags on, or as security conditions worsen. People I have worked with on staffing in Iraq lamented that many of the most qualified people had already &#8220;put in their time&#8221; and were burnt out after the first two years or so, and there simply isn&#8217;t an unlimited supply of good managers who also have the requisite regional experience, technical expertise and language skills.  The deteriorating security situation meant that it was harder and harder to do hands-on development work where aid workers could travel around the country and interact with beneficiary communities, and this added another major disincentive for the best people to take jobs there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/11/friday-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-7195</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/?p=1464#comment-7195</guid>
		<description>Apologies to those working in conflict areas if this seems offensive, but there must also be a selection effect going on in your &quot;bad bosses suck&quot; story, right? It&#039;s extremely difficult to get senior people to work in these places - that means offering higher salaries but accepting lower ability bosses. Also, results in conflict areas are much, much harder to verify. This makes it easier for some to shirk on doing good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies to those working in conflict areas if this seems offensive, but there must also be a selection effect going on in your &#8220;bad bosses suck&#8221; story, right? It&#8217;s extremely difficult to get senior people to work in these places &#8211; that means offering higher salaries but accepting lower ability bosses. Also, results in conflict areas are much, much harder to verify. This makes it easier for some to shirk on doing good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
