Comments on: Supermodel vows to stay naked till USAID funds reach starving children

By: Gangadhar

Gangadhar — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:12:27 +0000

some people are going to attention issue like hunger. this is good but this is not solution.

By: Gangadhar

Gangadhar — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:11:25 +0000

some people are going to attention issue like hunger. this is good but this is not solution.

By: Michael Blowhard

Michael Blowhard — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:05:31 +0000

“Is there some way to grab attention for good causes without selling out to our society’s worship of celebrity & sex?”

Let’s hope not.

By: Comment from anonymous middle-aged male

Comment from anonymous middle-aged male — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:13:29 +0000

No one could allege sexism or ageism if WE fought world hunger by going naked. Of course we’d probably be arrested first.

By: Wayan

Wayan — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:19:09 +0000

There is also a difference between quantity and quality. Those many supermodel driven eyeballs? Wortless compared to getting a handfull of the right folks reading a post. Stick with quality and own the audience you believe will effect change.

By: Sceptical Secondo

Sceptical Secondo — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:33:45 +0000

Twitter;

Strictly for birds!

Got it?

By: Tord Steiro

Tord Steiro — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:46:05 +0000

Bill.

You have a comparative advantage in writing scientific articles, books about economics, and intellectually stimulating bloggposts.

By: Paul

Paul — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:15:05 +0000

If you rearrange it, you could call it the COASSS theorem.

By: Pierre-Louis

Pierre-Louis — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 07:54:06 +0000

I say enough with hot chicks pics on aid watch…I got SI swinsuit issue for that…

By: Jon Custer

Jon Custer — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 07:06:51 +0000

So you’re saying that people dedicated to ending world poverty should take up bringing seriousness, subtlety, and intellectual rigor back into the popular discourse as a side project? In under 140 characters?

One lost cause at a time, please.