<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the British Invented “Development” to Keep the Empire and Substitute for Racism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/</link>
	<description>just asking that aid benefit the poor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pwyll</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/comment-page-1/#comment-6618</link>
		<dc:creator>pwyll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/#comment-6618</guid>
		<description>Sounds like the whole context that Easterly in arguing within is wrong.
This seems apropos: &lt;a href=&quot;http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/08/country-that-used-to-exist.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/08/country-that-used-to-exist.html&lt;/a&gt;
As do these two pieces on Egypt, then and now:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/07/i-wonder-if-jonah-goldberg-talks-about.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/07/i-wonder-if-jonah-goldberg-talks-about.html&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/world/africa/20cairo.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/world/africa/20cairo.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the whole context that Easterly in arguing within is wrong.</p>
<p>This seems apropos: <a href="http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/08/country-that-used-to-exist.html" rel="nofollow">http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/08/country-that-used-to-exist.html</a></p>
<p>As do these two pieces on Egypt, then and now:</p>
<p><a href="http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/07/i-wonder-if-jonah-goldberg-talks-about.html" rel="nofollow">http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/07/i-wonder-if-jonah-goldberg-talks-about.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/world/africa/20cairo.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/world/africa/20cairo.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR Villaveces</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/comment-page-1/#comment-6552</link>
		<dc:creator>JR Villaveces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/#comment-6552</guid>
		<description>Dr. Easterly,
I found your blog interesting, however I was unconvinced by some of the arguments made in the book that &#039;development&#039; originated with WWII.  I think that you are getting at something by pointing at &#039;failed states&#039; theory as being imperialistic, although most humanitarian justifications for invasion are currently based on the &#039;responsibility to protect&#039; clause of International Humanitarian Law, which French President Sarkozy among others argues overrides state sovereignty in some cases, ie., Myanmar which refused to accept Bush&#039;s $1 million in US military-delivered aid.
Best regards,
JRV
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Easterly,</p>
<p>I found your blog interesting, however I was unconvinced by some of the arguments made in the book that &#8216;development&#8217; originated with WWII.  I think that you are getting at something by pointing at &#8216;failed states&#8217; theory as being imperialistic, although most humanitarian justifications for invasion are currently based on the &#8216;responsibility to protect&#8217; clause of International Humanitarian Law, which French President Sarkozy among others argues overrides state sovereignty in some cases, ie., Myanmar which refused to accept Bush&#8217;s $1 million in US military-delivered aid.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>JRV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/comment-page-1/#comment-6551</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/#comment-6551</guid>
		<description>Easterly, do you know the work of Raul Prebisch or Celso Furtado? If you do, what are your thoughts about their take on poverty gap?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easterly, do you know the work of Raul Prebisch or Celso Furtado? If you do, what are your thoughts about their take on poverty gap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Jones</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/comment-page-1/#comment-6550</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/#comment-6550</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The idea that the purpose of the Empire was to promote &quot;development&quot; of the whole colony out of poverty and into prosperity (i.e. something that looked like England) was new at the time of WWII.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Sorry, Bill, but I&#039;m dubious. The idea of the west providing technology led progress was made manifest in the Great Exhibition of 1851. I suggest a reading of that fine novel, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Siege-Krishnapur-Review-Books-Classics/dp/159017092X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1253189220&amp;sr=8-1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Siege of Krishnapur&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The idea that the purpose of the Empire was to promote &#8220;development&#8221; of the whole colony out of poverty and into prosperity (i.e. something that looked like England) was new at the time of WWII.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry, Bill, but I&#8217;m dubious. The idea of the west providing technology led progress was made manifest in the Great Exhibition of 1851. I suggest a reading of that fine novel, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Siege-Krishnapur-Review-Books-Classics/dp/159017092X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1253189220&#038;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">The Siege of Krishnapur</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaddeswarup</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/comment-page-1/#comment-6549</link>
		<dc:creator>gaddeswarup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/#comment-6549</guid>
		<description>Books like &quot;Signal and Noise&quot; by Brian Larkin indicate that there were divisions in the British Foreign Office about development agendas. More systematic views and programs of devlopment may be due to American foundations:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/oss/ideologyofphilanthropy.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/oss/ideologyofphilanthropy.htm&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Books like &#8220;Signal and Noise&#8221; by Brian Larkin indicate that there were divisions in the British Foreign Office about development agendas. More systematic views and programs of devlopment may be due to American foundations:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/oss/ideologyofphilanthropy.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/oss/ideologyofphilanthropy.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/comment-page-1/#comment-6548</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/#comment-6548</guid>
		<description>As a side note, any chance that you could post some good books on the current state of international aid and development?  Are there any books that discuss &#039;parachute and suitcase&#039; medicine (or other short term, non stustainable operations) and their pitfalls?  I think one of the more difficult aspects of aid today is convincing those who believe that since the poor have little anything is better than nothing - which couldn&#039;t be further from the truth!  It seems like no matter which way you approach it people are going to feel defensive unless they make the realization themselves.
thanks in advance!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a side note, any chance that you could post some good books on the current state of international aid and development?  Are there any books that discuss &#8216;parachute and suitcase&#8217; medicine (or other short term, non stustainable operations) and their pitfalls?  I think one of the more difficult aspects of aid today is convincing those who believe that since the poor have little anything is better than nothing &#8211; which couldn&#8217;t be further from the truth!  It seems like no matter which way you approach it people are going to feel defensive unless they make the realization themselves.</p>
<p>thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hapa</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/comment-page-1/#comment-6547</link>
		<dc:creator>hapa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/#comment-6547</guid>
		<description>link to someone&#039;s excellent comment on this article:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/09/the-origin-of-development-as-cover-for-imperialism-and-racism.html?cid=6a00d83451b33869e20120a5767f39970b#comment-6a00d83451b33869e20120a5767f39970b&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/09/the-origin-of-development-as-cover-for-imperialism-and-racism.html?cid=6a00d83451b33869e20120a5767f39970b#comment-6a00d83451b33869e20120a5767f39970b&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>link to someone&#8217;s excellent comment on this article:</p>
<p><a href="http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/09/the-origin-of-development-as-cover-for-imperialism-and-racism.html?cid=6a00d83451b33869e20120a5767f39970b#comment-6a00d83451b33869e20120a5767f39970b" rel="nofollow">http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/09/the-origin-of-development-as-cover-for-imperialism-and-racism.html?cid=6a00d83451b33869e20120a5767f39970b#comment-6a00d83451b33869e20120a5767f39970b</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LorenzofromOz</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/comment-page-1/#comment-6546</link>
		<dc:creator>LorenzofromOz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/#comment-6546</guid>
		<description>Stephen Jones
&lt;i&gt;British racism in India, and attacks against miscegenation long pre-date the Suez Canal. They have a lot to do with the growth of Puritanism in England in the 1830s, a period when the young were embarrassed by the temperate language of their elders.&lt;/i&gt;
I do not think 30 years counts as &quot;long predates&quot;, but I am happy to accept the extra complication, though I was more interested in the patterns of intermarriage.
&lt;i&gt;The idea of the British being good for the natives goes back to Kipling&lt;/i&gt;
Much earlier than that.
Bill Easterly
&lt;i&gt;The idea that the purpose of the Empire was to promote &quot;development&quot; of the whole colony out of poverty and into prosperity (i.e. something that looked like England) was new at the time of WWII.&lt;/i&gt;
I think if you look at the program for India&#039;s Dominion status you will find that is a little overstated.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Jones</p>
<p><i>British racism in India, and attacks against miscegenation long pre-date the Suez Canal. They have a lot to do with the growth of Puritanism in England in the 1830s, a period when the young were embarrassed by the temperate language of their elders.</i></p>
<p>I do not think 30 years counts as &#8220;long predates&#8221;, but I am happy to accept the extra complication, though I was more interested in the patterns of intermarriage.</p>
<p><i>The idea of the British being good for the natives goes back to Kipling</i></p>
<p>Much earlier than that.</p>
<p>Bill Easterly</p>
<p><i>The idea that the purpose of the Empire was to promote &#8220;development&#8221; of the whole colony out of poverty and into prosperity (i.e. something that looked like England) was new at the time of WWII.</i></p>
<p>I think if you look at the program for India&#8217;s Dominion status you will find that is a little overstated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Custer</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/comment-page-1/#comment-6545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Custer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/#comment-6545</guid>
		<description>@Nwabu: I don&#039;t know about DFID but USAID considers the fact that most of their budget is spent in the US to be a selling point, at least when reporting to Congress. I recall reading a report c. 2004 where they were quite openly bragging that something like 80% of the budget made its way back to the US economy in one form or another.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nwabu: I don&#8217;t know about DFID but USAID considers the fact that most of their budget is spent in the US to be a selling point, at least when reporting to Congress. I recall reading a report c. 2004 where they were quite openly bragging that something like 80% of the budget made its way back to the US economy in one form or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James A. Donald</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/comment-page-1/#comment-6544</link>
		<dc:creator>James A. Donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/09/how-the-british-invented-%e2%80%9cdevelopment%e2%80%9d-to-keep-the-empire-and-substitute-for-racism/#comment-6544</guid>
		<description>Subsequent events demonstrate that the British really were superior: When the British left, it became apparent that many colonies were &quot;but little removed from their primitive state&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subsequent events demonstrate that the British really were superior: When the British left, it became apparent that many colonies were &#8220;but little removed from their primitive state&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
