<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Answer to Development Ignorance: More Complicated Advice by Experts or More Freedom for Entrepreneurs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/</link>
	<description>just asking that aid benefit the poor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:21:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NFrazier</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-4851</link>
		<dc:creator>NFrazier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/#comment-4851</guid>
		<description>When the world&#039;s largest planned economy also becomes the world&#039;s largest economy, how should free market capitalism respond?
For example, if China convinces Argentina to adopt the yuan as its currency, Argentina had better learn to love fiscal tightness like the Germany does...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the world&#8217;s largest planned economy also becomes the world&#8217;s largest economy, how should free market capitalism respond?</p>
<p>For example, if China convinces Argentina to adopt the yuan as its currency, Argentina had better learn to love fiscal tightness like the Germany does&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Jones</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-4850</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/#comment-4850</guid>
		<description>&quot;So in the end, the economics profession does have more sensible things to say about achieving long-run success than Beattie allows: (relatively) free individuals, free markets, free trade, free thinking, and institutions that support all of the above.&quot;
I think the key word here is &#039;relatively&#039;. In economies that run well over the long term (read offer eoncomic opportunity to the majority of people on a somewhat equitable basis) there appears to be a balance between private and public sectors. For example, functioning governments offer unbiased regulation and enforcement; the private sector provides entrepreurial energy, finance and market opportunities. It is not an either or, but a case of checks and balances to produce reasonable outcomes for the majority of citizens without undue gains to one group to the detriment of the other.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So in the end, the economics profession does have more sensible things to say about achieving long-run success than Beattie allows: (relatively) free individuals, free markets, free trade, free thinking, and institutions that support all of the above.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think the key word here is &#8216;relatively&#8217;. In economies that run well over the long term (read offer eoncomic opportunity to the majority of people on a somewhat equitable basis) there appears to be a balance between private and public sectors. For example, functioning governments offer unbiased regulation and enforcement; the private sector provides entrepreurial energy, finance and market opportunities. It is not an either or, but a case of checks and balances to produce reasonable outcomes for the majority of citizens without undue gains to one group to the detriment of the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NFrazier</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-4849</link>
		<dc:creator>NFrazier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/#comment-4849</guid>
		<description>Distributed control, especially within a stable macroeconomic environment, tends to produce higher growth rates. Centralized control, on the other hand, can lead to e.g. - supply chain inefficiencies.
One might argue further that a system of purely distributed control ultimately teaches microeconomic agents to factor macroeconomic volatility into their decision making. Perhaps if the Fed had refused to allow real interest rates to fall below a certain bound from 1990 onwards, for example, deeper recessions then would have prevented the imbalances the world is facing today.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Distributed control, especially within a stable macroeconomic environment, tends to produce higher growth rates. Centralized control, on the other hand, can lead to e.g. &#8211; supply chain inefficiencies.</p>
<p>One might argue further that a system of purely distributed control ultimately teaches microeconomic agents to factor macroeconomic volatility into their decision making. Perhaps if the Fed had refused to allow real interest rates to fall below a certain bound from 1990 onwards, for example, deeper recessions then would have prevented the imbalances the world is facing today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moussa</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-4848</link>
		<dc:creator>Moussa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/#comment-4848</guid>
		<description>These are compelling arguments. However, I have one concern with it:
It is a fact that one has not been able to uncover the secrets of growth and/or to implement them, but does that necessarily mean that they cannot be uncovered?
Many scientific progresses and innovations have taken pretty long to come to life. I believe that the research should continue to explore different directions and never assume impossibility on basis of complexity.
Meanwhile, it is true that the best prescription today should be centered around the freedom as the post advocates for.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are compelling arguments. However, I have one concern with it:</p>
<p>It is a fact that one has not been able to uncover the secrets of growth and/or to implement them, but does that necessarily mean that they cannot be uncovered?</p>
<p>Many scientific progresses and innovations have taken pretty long to come to life. I believe that the research should continue to explore different directions and never assume impossibility on basis of complexity.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, it is true that the best prescription today should be centered around the freedom as the post advocates for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick gogerty</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-4847</link>
		<dc:creator>nick gogerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/#comment-4847</guid>
		<description>It begs the question, if we can&#039;t &quot;Stimulate&quot; others economies, how can we stimulate our own?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It begs the question, if we can&#8217;t &#8220;Stimulate&#8221; others economies, how can we stimulate our own?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafe Champion</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-4846</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafe Champion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/the-answer-to-development-ignorance-more-complicated-advice-by-experts-or-more-freedom-for-entrepreneurs/#comment-4846</guid>
		<description>Interesting, but predictable:)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but predictable:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
