<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random Snippets and Miscellany</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/random-snippets-and-miscellany/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/random-snippets-and-miscellany/</link>
	<description>just asking that aid benefit the poor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zulusafari</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/random-snippets-and-miscellany/comment-page-1/#comment-4917</link>
		<dc:creator>zulusafari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 05:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/random-snippets-and-miscellany/#comment-4917</guid>
		<description>I just read Mrs. Peasley&#039;s full piece. It&#039;s a joke of a argument. Anyone can give one good example when there are 100,000 cases of aid to choose from. We&#039;re trying to look at the big picture here. She points out that the worst scenarios that Dead Aid points out were Cold War battle grounds. Who&#039;s saying there isn&#039;t just as much politics in today&#039;s aid given.
She also says that so many countries getting aid back then had unstable gov&#039;ts... NEWS FLASH, nothing has changed. More unstable gov&#039;ts get aid than non-stable. This is another argument Dead Aid makes. Stable gov&#039;ts and economies DON&#039;T need aid to begin with.
This is frustrating beyond belief.
I wonder if there is one aid worker in the whole world who had read this book with an open mind. Lots of jobs are at stake.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read Mrs. Peasley&#8217;s full piece. It&#8217;s a joke of a argument. Anyone can give one good example when there are 100,000 cases of aid to choose from. We&#8217;re trying to look at the big picture here. She points out that the worst scenarios that Dead Aid points out were Cold War battle grounds. Who&#8217;s saying there isn&#8217;t just as much politics in today&#8217;s aid given.</p>
<p>She also says that so many countries getting aid back then had unstable gov&#8217;ts&#8230; NEWS FLASH, nothing has changed. More unstable gov&#8217;ts get aid than non-stable. This is another argument Dead Aid makes. Stable gov&#8217;ts and economies DON&#8217;T need aid to begin with.</p>
<p>This is frustrating beyond belief.</p>
<p>I wonder if there is one aid worker in the whole world who had read this book with an open mind. Lots of jobs are at stake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/random-snippets-and-miscellany/comment-page-1/#comment-4916</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/random-snippets-and-miscellany/#comment-4916</guid>
		<description>Keep up the good fight Bill.  Down by 100%?  This person must have been an economist!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good fight Bill.  Down by 100%?  This person must have been an economist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian H</title>
		<link>http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/random-snippets-and-miscellany/comment-page-1/#comment-4915</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aidwatchers.com/2009/04/random-snippets-and-miscellany/#comment-4915</guid>
		<description>Good post, Bill. Do you know anything about the &lt;a&gt;latest figure on malaria reduction&lt;/a&gt; in Zambia that&#039;s been bandied around? (&quot;Malaria deaths plunge by 66%&quot;).
As you previously reported, the 2008 Malaria Report was blunt about the lac of reliable data in Zambia, so it would be interesting to know how robust these new stats are.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Bill. Do you know anything about the <a>latest figure on malaria reduction</a> in Zambia that&#8217;s been bandied around? (&#8220;Malaria deaths plunge by 66%&#8221;).</p>
<p>As you previously reported, the 2008 Malaria Report was blunt about the lac of reliable data in Zambia, so it would be interesting to know how robust these new stats are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
